<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link href="/en/blog/5147/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><link>http://blog.euroscience.org/en/blog/welcome-to-the-euroscientist-246/structuring-scientific-knowledge-online,5147/</link><description></description><title>Welcome to the Euroscientist! - Structuring scientific knowledge online</title><language>en</language><item><title>Part II: What would knowledge structuring look like if it were invented today?</title><description>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Science is already a wiki if you look at it a certain way. It&amp;rsquo;s just a highly inefficient one -- the incremental edits are made in papers instead of wikispace, and significant effort is expended to recapitulate existing knowledge in a paper in order to support the one to three new assertions made in any one paper. &lt;/i&gt;(&lt;a shape=&quot;rect&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; class=&quot;external text ext&quot; href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/07/publishing_science_on_the_web.php&quot;&gt;John Wilbanks&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;img lang=&quot;en&quot; src=&quot;http://blog.euroscience.org/publicmedia/formatted/515/7/en/Daniel%20Mitchen;maxh=150,maxw=124,h=180,w=149.png&quot; alt=&quot;Daniel Mitchen&quot; style=&quot;width: 124px; height: 150px;&quot; xml:lang=&quot;en&quot; change:id=&quot;media-5157&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><guid>http://blog.euroscience.org/en/blog/welcome-to-the-euroscientist-246/part-ii-what-would-knowledge-structuring-look-like-if-it-were-invented-today,5148.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>

